The importance of evaluating programs of school, family and community partnerships
PDF (English)

Cómo citar

Joyce L., & Steven B. (2019). The importance of evaluating programs of school, family and community partnerships. Aula Abierta, 48(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.48.1.2019.31-42

Resumen

Educators know that “What gets measured gets done.” Historically, however, they have avoided evaluating programs and practices of school, family, and community partnerships.  They focused, instead, on evaluating other components of school organization (e.g., curriculum, achievement test scores), and weakened programs of family and community engagement.  Studies indicate that when school-based partnership teams take time to evaluate their efforts, they demonstrate a seriousness of purpose that leads to more equitable outreach to engage all families in their children’s education, and more goal-linked engagement activities that contribute to student success in school.  This article presents information on no-cost, low-cost, and costly ways to evaluate the quality and progress of plans and practices of family and community engagement.  We discuss the difference between evaluating program implementations and evaluating program results. We identify more than a dozen tools and templates that make it possible for all schools to organize, evaluate, and continually improve their partnership programs.
https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.48.1.2019.31-42
PDF (English)

Citas

References

Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing.

Catsambis, S. (2001). Expanding the knowledge of parental involvement in children’s secondary education: Connections with high school seniors’ academic success. Social Psychology of Education, 5, 149-177.

Dearing, E., McCartney, K., Weiss, H. B., Kreider, H., & Simpkins, S. (2004). The promotive effects of family educational involvement for low-income children’s literacy. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 445-460.

Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 701-712.

Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools, Second Edition. Boulder CO: Westview.

Epstein, J. L. (2017). Manual for teachers: TIPS interactive homework (elementary and middle grades). Baltimore: Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships at Johns Hopkins University.

Epstein, J. L. et al. (2019). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action, fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Epstein, J. L., & Salinas, K. C. (1993). School and family partnerships: Questionnaires for teachers and parents in elementary and middle grades. Baltimore: Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships at Johns Hopkins University.

Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2006). Moving forward: Ideas for research on school, family, and community partnerships.” In C. G. Conrad and R. Serlin (Eds.), SAGE handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry, (pp. 117-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2016). Necessary but not sufficient: The role of policy for advancing programs of school, family, and community partnerships. Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(5), 202-219.

Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2019). Evaluate programs of partnership: Critical considerations. In J. L. Epstein et al. School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action, fourth edition. (pp. 323-359). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Epstein, J. L., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2019). How to implement Teachers Involve Parents in Schoolwork (TIPS) processes. In J. L. Epstein et al. School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action, fourth edition. (pp. 283-322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Epstein, J. L., Connors-Tadros, L., & Salinas, K. C. (1993). High school and family partnerships: Questionnaires for teachers, parents, and students. Baltimore: Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships at Johns Hopkins University.

Epstein, J. L., Galindo, C., & Sheldon, S. B. (2011). Levels of leadership: Effects of district and school leaders on the quality of school programs of family and community involvement. Educational Administration Quarterly 47, 462-495.

Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1-21.

Harvard Family Research Project (2011). Evaluating family engagement strategies: Addressing measurement challenges (Webinar). https://uww.adobeconnect.com/p7apep6zaw2/?launcher=-

false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal.

Harvard Graduate School of Education. (2014). Parent survey for K-12 schools. See ww.surveymonkey.com/mp/harvardeducation-surveys/.

Henderson, A. T., Mapp, K. L., Johnson, V. R., & Davies, D. (2007). Beyond the bake sale: The essential guide to family-school partnerships. New York: The New Press.

Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45, 740-763.

Jeynes, W. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35, 202-218.

Jeynes, W. H. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47, 706-742.

Mac Iver, M., Sheldon, S., Epstein, J., Rice, E., Mac Iver, D., & Simmons, A. (2018). Engaging families in the high school transition: Initial findings from a continuous improvement initiative. School Community Journal, 28, 37-66.

NAEYC (2016). Self assessment family survey. Washington, D. C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children. See https://ase.tufts.edu/epcs/documents/infoFamilySurvey.pdf.

Park, S., Hironaka, S., Carver, P., & Nordstrum, L. (2013). Continuous improvement in education. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Partners in School Innovation (2016) Results oriented cycle of inquiry (ROCI). See https://www.partnersinschools.org/services/results-oriented-cycles-of-inquiry-roci/.

Sanders, M. G., & Harvey, A. (2002). Beyond the school walls: A case study of principal leadership for school-community collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104, 1345-1368.

Sanders, M. G., & Sheldon, S. B. (2009). A principal’s guide to school, family, and community partnerships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Sheldon, S. B. (2003). Linking school-family-community partnerships in urban elementary schools to student achievement on state tests. The Urban Review, 35, 149-165.

Sheldon, S. B. (2005). Testing a structural equation model of partnership program implementation and parent involvement. Elementary School Journal, 106, 171-187.

Sheldon, S. B. (2007). Improving student attendance with school, family, and community partnerships. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 267-275.

Sheldon, S. B. (2009). Using evaluation to prove and improve the quality of partnership programmes in schools. In R. Deslandes (Ed.), International perspectives on contexts, communities and evaluated innovative practices: Family-school-community partnerships (pp. 126-142). New York, NY: Routledge.

Sheldon, S. B. (2019). Improving student outcomes with school, family, and community partnerships: A research review. In J. L., Epstein et al. School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action, fourth edition (pp. 43-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Sheldon, S. B., & Epstein, J. L. (2007). Family and community involvement in the elementary and middle grades: Student survey and parent survey. Baltimore: Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships, Johns Hopkins University.

Sheldon, S. B., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2004). Partnership programs in U.S. schools: Their development and relationship to family involvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 125-148.

Simon, B. S. (2004). High school outreach and family involvement. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 185-209.

U. S. Department of Education (2016). Using evidence to strengthen educational investments.https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/guidanceuseseinvestment.pdf

Van Voorhis, F. L. (2011). Adding families to the homework equation: A longitudinal study of mathematics achievement. Education and Urban Society, 43, 313-338.

Van Voorhis, F. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2004). Principals’ roles in the development of U.S. programs of school, family, and community partnerships. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 55-70.

Van Voorhis, F. L., Maier, M. F., Epstein, J. L., & Lloyd, C. M. (2013). The impact of family involvement on the education of children ages 3–8: A focus on literacy and math achievement outcomes and social-emotional skills. New York: MDRC.

Westmoreland, H., López, M. E., & Rosenberg, H. (2009). How to develop a logic model for districtwide family engagement strategies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.

Weiss, C. H. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 21-33.

Wilder, S. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 66, 377-397.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.